Institute  Home

Strategy School

Strategy Shop

Strategy Trainers

Strategy Blog

Affiliate Program

TRAINING HOME
The Science of Strategy

   About the Institute
      Customer Testimonials

      Corporate Customers

The Strategy School
The Strategy Shop

Home
Up
Predicting
Incomplete
Subjective
Decisions

  

The Challenge
Information Flood

Predicting the Future
Incomplete Information
Subjective Information
Decisions With Limited Information

Incomplete Information

In competitive environments, we operate with incomplete information as a matter of course. No battle in history would ever have been fought if people had good information about their relative strengths. Both sides would know before the battle who would win. Battles are fought only because both sides think they can win. Someone is wrong. At the most, only one side can be right. Both sides are often wrong when we consider the cost and value of many battles.

But no one knows who will win in competition. The information any group has is an insignificant portion of the total information in the environment. Getting all the information you need to bake a cake in a controlled environment is relatively easy. Getting all the information you need to sell cakes in the competitive market is much more difficult. There are always too many variables. There are always too many unknowns. Who can know how many people will decide they want to buy a cake today? Many who buy cakes in the afternoon didn't even have that information themselves in the morning.

Competitive environments are also filled with misinformation. Competitors try to mislead each other regarding not only their future plans but their current circumstances. Individuals distort the truth for a variety of reasons. As in a game of poker, any advantage you have is linked to what you know that the other players don't know.

The limitations of information affect a buyer as well as a seller. Internal resources are resources about which we have good information. We do not have good information about external resources, that is, the resources that others have. This makes finding the best product, the lowest-cost supplier, or a reliable service provider a challenge. The volume of unknown information in the external market is always much more than the known information available to any single decision-maker.

Our only guide to the future in competitive environments is the past. And while there is some continuity with the past, our information is constantly outdated. While some aspects of the past will continue, other aspects will change. Using planning to decide future actions in these environments is like driving a car forward when you can only see out the rear window. As long as the road runs straight, this can work, but when the road turns, as it always eventually does, it is disastrous.

In controlled environments, everyone is relatively well informed about what is changing. In larger, more complex, competitive environments, it is infinitely more difficult to keep up with increasingly fast-changing information.

The past does not predict the future in competitive environments. Neither does planning. Conditions are fluid. New alternatives are constantly being offered. Everyone is continuously reacting to the changes around them, creating dynamic situations. Everyone predicts success, but actual results are unpredictable. When people are successful, they think their planning worked. When they fail, they blame their plans. Most fail to see the effects of strategy because they don't understand the differences between strategy and planning.

The Science of Strategy Institute

     Privacy Policy: Your Privacy Rights                  Terms of Service 

Training Seminars Held Worldwide

Copyright 2005-2008 Science of Strategy Institute/Clearbridge Publishing, Gary Gagliardi